Two ways to read the same certified data. Switch any time; your choice is remembered on this device.
Dettson vs DUCTLESSAIRE: heat pump ratings compared
Against heat pumps of the same size and type, a typical Dettson model beats 52% and a typical DUCTLESSAIRE model 51%. Dettson rates slightly higher overall.
Covers older R-410A heat pumps, no longer installed new. See models sold today · Updated
Dettson
52%
of similar heat pumps beaten by its typical model
About average10 models listed
DUCTLESSAIRE
51%
of similar heat pumps beaten by its typical model
About average10 models listed
- Efficiency on a 5°F dayCOP at 5°FDettson: Beats 55%DUCTLESSAIRE: Beats 47%
- Heating power kept at 5°FCapacity at 5°F vs 47°FDettson: Beats 71%DUCTLESSAIRE: Beats 36%
- Winter-long heating efficiencyHSPF2Dettson: Beats 78%DUCTLESSAIRE: Beats 54%
- Summer-long cooling efficiencySEER2Dettson: Beats 42%DUCTLESSAIRE: Beats 61%
- Hot-day cooling efficiencyEER2Dettson: Beats 30%DUCTLESSAIRE: Beats 49%
Average (50%)Dashed outline: the other brand, for comparison
Want ranks, distributions per size class and cold-weather curves? Switch to Advanced
Rebate standards
CEE 2025
- Dettson
- 60%
- DUCTLESSAIRE
- 60%
Xcel CC
- Dettson
- 80%
- DUCTLESSAIRE
- 40%
CEE Advanced
- Dettson
- 0%
- DUCTLESSAIRE
- 0%
ENERGY STAR CC
- Dettson
- 100%
- DUCTLESSAIRE
- 20%
Top cold-climate picks, ductless 3.5–4.5 tons
Only units that keep at least 70% of their heat at 5°F, ranked on heat kept, efficiency at 5°F and seasonal efficiency (HSPF2), against units their size.
Showing Ductless, 3.5–4.5 tons (39,000–56,999 Btu/h cooling). What size is my system?
Dettson
No ductless, 3.5–4.5 tons model from Dettson.
DUCTLESSAIRE
None of DUCTLESSAIRE’s ductless, 3.5–4.5 tons models qualifies.
These are certified test ratings, not a recommendation for your home. The right size comes from a load calculation by a contractor.
Next steps
The advanced view adds ranks, both brands’ models inside every size class, standout models per rating and cold-weather curves.
Open the advanced view