Skip to content
Rebate.Blue

Ephoca vs Midea: heat pump ratings compared

Against heat pumps of the same size and type, a typical Ephoca model beats 20% and a typical Midea model 54%. Midea rates higher overall.

Covers older R-410A heat pumps, no longer installed new. See models sold today · Updated

Ephoca

20%

of similar heat pumps beaten by its typical model

Well below average

30 models listed

Midea

54%

of similar heat pumps beaten by its typical model

About average

402 models listed

Rating by ratingEach bar is the share of same-size, same-type heat pumps that a typical model beats, so the two brands compare fairly even if they make different sizes.
  • Efficiency on a 5°F dayCOP at 5°FEphoca: Beats 4%Midea: Beats 49%
  • Heating power kept at 5°FCapacity at 5°F vs 47°FEphoca: Beats 48%Midea: Beats 52%
  • Winter-long heating efficiencyHSPF2Ephoca: Beats 38%Midea: Beats 63%
  • Summer-long cooling efficiencySEER2Ephoca: Beats 7%Midea: Beats 58%
  • Hot-day cooling efficiencyEER2Ephoca: Beats 14%Midea: Beats 47%

Average (50%)Dashed outline: the other brand, for comparison

Want ranks, distributions per size class and cold-weather curves? Switch to Advanced

Rebate standards

Share of each brand’s models that meet the level. Programs can have other rules too.

  • CEE 2025

    Ephoca
    0%
    Midea
    60%

  • Xcel CC

    Ephoca
    0%
    Midea
    45%

  • CEE Advanced

    Ephoca
    0%
    Midea
    3%

  • ENERGY STAR CC

    Ephoca
    13%
    Midea
    38%

Top cold-climate picks, ductless up to 1.5 tons

Only units that keep at least 70% of their heat at 5°F, ranked on heat kept, efficiency at 5°F and seasonal efficiency (HSPF2), against units their size.

Showing Ductless, Up to 1.5 tons (under 21,000 Btu/h cooling). What size is my system?

Ephoca

  1. 1APP10*4*1with ductless indoor unit APP10*4*1EphocaAlso listed as APP10*4*2, APK10*4*21 ton · 9,000 Btu/h · DuctlessKeeps 81% of its heat at 5°FMeets ENERGY STAR CC
    Heat kept at 5°F
    81% (Capacity at 5°F vs 47°F)
    Good
    Efficiency at 5°F
    1.75 (COP at 5°F)
    Below the middle
    Seasonal efficiency
    8.6 (HSPF2)
    Below the middle
    32.8score / 100
  2. 2APE10*4*2with ductless indoor unit APE10*4*2Ephoca1 ton · 9,000 Btu/h · DuctlessKeeps 74% of its heat at 5°FMeets ENERGY STAR CC
    Heat kept at 5°F
    74% (Capacity at 5°F vs 47°F)
    Good
    Efficiency at 5°F
    1.75 (COP at 5°F)
    Below the middle
    Seasonal efficiency
    8.6 (HSPF2)
    Below the middle
    29.3score / 100

Midea

  1. 1DLCPRBH18AAKwith ductless indoor unit DLFPHBH18XAKMideaAlso sold as MDV MOD30-18HFN1-MZ20W; also listed as 38MPRBQ18AA31.5 tons · 18,000 Btu/h · DuctlessKeeps 120% of its heat at 5°FMeets CEE 2025, CEE 2026, CEE Advanced, Xcel CC, DOE CCHP, ENERGY STAR CC
    Heat kept at 5°F
    120% (Capacity at 5°F vs 47°F)
    Top 10%
    Efficiency at 5°F
    2.89 (COP at 5°F)
    Top 10%
    Seasonal efficiency
    11.0 (HSPF2)
    Great
    95.0score / 100
  2. 2MOX230-09HFN1-MY2Wwith ductless indoor unit MFA2U-09HRFN1-MY6WMidea (sold as MDV)1 ton · 9,000 Btu/h · DuctlessKeeps 96% of its heat at 5°FMeets CEE 2025, CEE 2026, Xcel CC, ENERGY STAR CC
    Heat kept at 5°F
    96% (Capacity at 5°F vs 47°F)
    Great
    Efficiency at 5°F
    2.45 (COP at 5°F)
    Top 10%
    Seasonal efficiency
    12.5 (HSPF2)
    Top 10%
    92.4score / 100
  3. 3MOX230-09HFN1-MW5W-Lwith ductless indoor unit MSEPB-06HRFN1-MY5WMidea (sold as MDV)0.5 tons · 6,000 Btu/h · DuctlessKeeps 107% of its heat at 5°FMeets CEE 2025, CEE 2026, CEE Advanced, Xcel CC, DOE CCHP, ENERGY STAR CC
    Heat kept at 5°F
    107% (Capacity at 5°F vs 47°F)
    Top 10%
    Efficiency at 5°F
    2.10 (COP at 5°F)
    Great
    Seasonal efficiency
    13.6 (HSPF2)
    Top 10%
    90.2score / 100

These are certified test ratings, not a recommendation for your home. The right size comes from a load calculation by a contractor.

Next steps

The advanced view adds ranks, both brands’ models inside every size class, standout models per rating and cold-weather curves.

Open the advanced view