Skip to content
Rebate.Blue

CIAC vs Custom Comfort: heat pump ratings compared

Against heat pumps of the same size and type, a typical CIAC model beats 50% and a typical Custom Comfort model 65%. Custom Comfort rates higher overall.

Covers older R-410A heat pumps, no longer installed new. See models sold today · Updated

CIAC

50%

of similar heat pumps beaten by its typical model

About average

21 models listed

Custom Comfort

65%

of similar heat pumps beaten by its typical model

Well above average

20 models listed

Rating by ratingEach bar is the share of same-size, same-type heat pumps that a typical model beats, so the two brands compare fairly even if they make different sizes.
  • Efficiency on a 5°F dayCOP at 5°FCIAC: Beats 64%Custom Comfort: Beats 50%
  • Heating power kept at 5°FCapacity at 5°F vs 47°FCIAC: Beats 37%Custom Comfort: Beats 83%
  • Winter-long heating efficiencyHSPF2CIAC: Beats 54%Custom Comfort: Beats 84%
  • Summer-long cooling efficiencySEER2CIAC: Beats 45%Custom Comfort: Beats 65%
  • Hot-day cooling efficiencyEER2CIAC: Beats 39%Custom Comfort: Beats 51%

Average (50%)Dashed outline: the other brand, for comparison

Want ranks, distributions per size class and cold-weather curves? Switch to Advanced

Rebate standards

Share of each brand’s models that meet the level. Programs can have other rules too.

  • CEE 2025

    CIAC
    48%
    Custom Comfort
    75%

  • Xcel CC

    CIAC
    24%
    Custom Comfort
    85%

  • CEE Advanced

    CIAC
    0%
    Custom Comfort
    5%

  • ENERGY STAR CC

    CIAC
    0%
    Custom Comfort
    100%

All-around best, ducted 2.5–3 tons

Balances heating (5°F output and efficiency, HSPF2) and cooling (SEER2, EER2), each rating against units their size.

Showing Ducted, 2.5–3 tons (27,000–38,999 Btu/h cooling), the most-listed ducted size. Pick yours above. What size is my system?

CIAC

  1. 1CM43BX036-H3N2Hwith ducted air handler CC43BX036-E3N1HCIAC3 tons · 36,000 Btu/h · DuctedNot a cold-climate pick: keeps 55% of its heat at 5°FMeets none of the standards tracked here
    Heat kept at 5°F
    55% (Capacity at 5°F vs 47°F)
    Below the middle
    Efficiency at 5°F
    1.91 (COP at 5°F)
    Good
    Winter efficiency
    8.8 (HSPF2)
    Good
    Cooling efficiency
    15.8 (SEER2)
    Below the middle
    Hot-day cooling
    8.8 (EER2)
    Below the middle
    37.6score / 100Heating 48 · Cooling 28

Custom Comfort

  1. 1CCOXHAMZ327HPCustom Comfort2.5 tons · 27,000 Btu/h · DuctedCold-climate pick, score 80.4Meets CEE 2025, CEE 2026, Xcel CC, ENERGY STAR CC
    Heat kept at 5°F
    101% (Capacity at 5°F vs 47°F)
    Top 10%
    Efficiency at 5°F
    1.90 (COP at 5°F)
    Good
    Winter efficiency
    10.0 (HSPF2)
    Top 10%
    Cooling efficiency
    19.0 (SEER2)
    Great
    Hot-day cooling
    11.8 (EER2)
    Great
    81.9score / 100Heating 80 · Cooling 83
  2. 2CCOXHAMZ436HPCustom Comfort3 tons · 36,000 Btu/h · DuctedCold-climate pick, score 63.7Meets none of the standards tracked here
    Heat kept at 5°F
    89% (Capacity at 5°F vs 47°F)
    Great
    Efficiency at 5°F
    1.70 (COP at 5°F)
    Below the middle
    Winter efficiency
    10.0 (HSPF2)
    Top 10%
    Cooling efficiency
    19.0 (SEER2)
    Great
    Hot-day cooling
    11.7 (EER2)
    Good
    71.2score / 100Heating 64 · Cooling 79
  3. 3CCOXHASZ36CHPwith ducted air handler CCOXHASD36Custom Comfort3 tons · 36,000 Btu/h · DuctedCold-climate pick, score 79.9Meets ENERGY STAR CC
    Heat kept at 5°F
    86% (Capacity at 5°F vs 47°F)
    Great
    Efficiency at 5°F
    1.98 (COP at 5°F)
    Good
    Winter efficiency
    11.0 (HSPF2)
    Top 10%
    Cooling efficiency
    16.5 (SEER2)
    Good
    Hot-day cooling
    9.0 (EER2)
    Below the middle
    58.3score / 100Heating 80 · Cooling 37

These are certified test ratings, not a recommendation for your home. The right size comes from a load calculation by a contractor.

Next steps

The advanced view adds ranks, both brands’ models inside every size class, standout models per rating and cold-weather curves.

Open the advanced view