Skip to content

COOL PRO vs VINO: heat pump ratings compared

One of these brands has too few models with every rating for an overall score; see each rating below.

Covers heat pumps sold new today (R-454B and R-32 refrigerant). See older R-410A models · Updated

COOL PRO

—

of similar heat pumps beaten by its typical model

Not enough rated models

7 models listed

VINO

74%

of similar heat pumps beaten by its typical model

Well above average

7 models listed

Rating by ratingEach bar is the share of same-size, same-type heat pumps that a typical model beats, so the two brands compare fairly even if they make different sizes.
  • Efficiency on a 5°F dayCOP at 5°FCOOL PRO: Not ratedVINO: Beats 74%
  • Heating power kept at 5°FCapacity at 5°F vs 47°FCOOL PRO: Not ratedVINO: Beats 64%
  • Winter-long heating efficiencyHSPF2COOL PRO: Beats 26%VINO: Beats 72%
  • Summer-long cooling efficiencySEER2COOL PRO: Beats 23%VINO: Beats 84%
  • Hot-day cooling efficiencyEER2COOL PRO: Beats 61%VINO: Beats 72%

Average (50%)Dashed outline: the other brand, for comparison

Want ranks, distributions per size class and cold-weather curves? Switch to Advanced

Rebate standards

Share of each brand’s models that meet the level. Programs can have other rules too.
  • CEE 2025

    COOL PRO
    0%
    VINO
    100%
  • Xcel CC

    COOL PRO
    0%
    VINO
    100%
  • CEE Advanced

    COOL PRO
    0%
    VINO
    0%
  • ENERGY STAR CC

    COOL PRO
    0%
    VINO
    100%

All-around best, ductless 2.5–3 tons

Balances heating (5°F output and efficiency, HSPF2) and cooling (SEER2, EER2), each rating against units their size.

COOL PRO

No ductless, 2.5–3 tons model from COOL PRO.

VINO

No ductless, 2.5–3 tons model from VINO.

These are certified test ratings, not a recommendation for your home. The right size comes from a load calculation by a contractor.

Next steps

The advanced view adds ranks, both brands’ models inside every size class, standout models per rating and cold-weather curves.

Open the advanced view