Two ways to read the same certified data. Switch any time; your choice is remembered on this device.
Cowsar vs Fuji: heat pump ratings compared
Against heat pumps of the same size and type, a typical Cowsar model beats 34% and a typical Fuji model 52%. Fuji rates higher overall.
Covers heat pumps sold new today (R-454B and R-32 refrigerant). See older R-410A models · Updated
Cowsar
34%
of similar heat pumps beaten by its typical model
Well below average12 models listed
Fuji
52%
of similar heat pumps beaten by its typical model
About average12 models listed
- Efficiency on a 5°F dayCOP at 5°FCowsar: Beats 61%Fuji: Beats 54%
- Heating power kept at 5°FCapacity at 5°F vs 47°FCowsar: Beats 28%Fuji: Beats 57%
- Winter-long heating efficiencyHSPF2Cowsar: Beats 25%Fuji: Beats 55%
- Summer-long cooling efficiencySEER2Cowsar: Beats 36%Fuji: Beats 59%
- Hot-day cooling efficiencyEER2Cowsar: Beats 23%Fuji: Beats 37%
Average (50%)Dashed outline: the other brand, for comparison
Want ranks, distributions per size class and cold-weather curves? Switch to Advanced
Rebate standards
CEE 2025
- Cowsar
- 75%
- Fuji
- 75%
Xcel CC
- Cowsar
- 50%
- Fuji
- 67%
CEE Advanced
- Cowsar
- 0%
- Fuji
- 0%
ENERGY STAR CC
- Cowsar
- 0%
- Fuji
- 0%
All-around best, ductless 3.5–4.5 tons
Balances heating (5°F output and efficiency, HSPF2) and cooling (SEER2, EER2), each rating against units their size.
Showing Ductless, 3.5–4.5 tons (39,000–56,999 Btu/h cooling). What size is my system?
Cowsar
No ductless, 3.5–4.5 tons model from Cowsar.
Fuji
No ductless, 3.5–4.5 tons model from Fuji.
These are certified test ratings, not a recommendation for your home. The right size comes from a load calculation by a contractor.
Next steps
The advanced view adds ranks, both brands’ models inside every size class, standout models per rating and cold-weather curves.
Open the advanced view