Skip to content

ADP vs Ecoer: heat pump ratings compared

Against heat pumps of the same size and type, a typical ADP model beats 49% and a typical Ecoer model 54%. Ecoer rates higher overall.

Covers heat pumps sold new today (R-454B and R-32 refrigerant). See older R-410A models · Updated

ADP

49%

of similar heat pumps beaten by its typical model

About average

15 models listed

Ecoer

54%

of similar heat pumps beaten by its typical model

About average

15 models listed

Rating by ratingEach bar is the share of same-size, same-type heat pumps that a typical model beats, so the two brands compare fairly even if they make different sizes.
  • Efficiency on a 5°F dayCOP at 5°FADP: Beats 35%Ecoer: Beats 46%
  • Heating power kept at 5°FCapacity at 5°F vs 47°FADP: Beats 86%Ecoer: Beats 65%
  • Winter-long heating efficiencyHSPF2ADP: Beats 51%Ecoer: Beats 68%
  • Summer-long cooling efficiencySEER2ADP: Beats 37%Ecoer: Beats 60%
  • Hot-day cooling efficiencyEER2ADP: Beats 43%Ecoer: Beats 37%

Average (50%)Dashed outline: the other brand, for comparison

Want ranks, distributions per size class and cold-weather curves? Switch to Advanced

Rebate standards

Share of each brand’s models that meet the level. Programs can have other rules too.
  • CEE 2025

    ADP
    27%
    Ecoer
    93%
  • Xcel CC

    ADP
    87%
    Ecoer
    93%
  • CEE Advanced

    ADP
    7%
    Ecoer
    0%
  • ENERGY STAR CC

    ADP
    0%
    Ecoer
    100%

Top cold-climate picks, ductless 2.5–3 tons

Only units that keep at least 70% of their heat at 5°F, ranked on heat kept, efficiency at 5°F and seasonal efficiency (HSPF2), against units their size.

ADP

No ductless, 2.5–3 tons model from ADP.

Ecoer

No ductless, 2.5–3 tons model from Ecoer.

These are certified test ratings, not a recommendation for your home. The right size comes from a load calculation by a contractor.

Next steps

The advanced view adds ranks, both brands’ models inside every size class, standout models per rating and cold-weather curves.

Open the advanced view