Skip to content

BlueRidge vs Daikin: heat pump ratings compared

Against heat pumps of the same size and type, a typical BlueRidge model beats 54% and a typical Daikin model 45%. BlueRidge rates higher overall.

Covers older R-410A heat pumps, no longer installed new. See models sold today · Updated

BlueRidge

54%

of similar heat pumps beaten by its typical model

About average

83 models listed

Daikin

45%

of similar heat pumps beaten by its typical model

Below average

367 models listed

Rating by ratingEach bar is the share of same-size, same-type heat pumps that a typical model beats, so the two brands compare fairly even if they make different sizes.
  • Efficiency on a 5°F dayCOP at 5°FBlueRidge: Beats 51%Daikin: Beats 56%
  • Heating power kept at 5°FCapacity at 5°F vs 47°FBlueRidge: Beats 57%Daikin: Beats 40%
  • Winter-long heating efficiencyHSPF2BlueRidge: Beats 55%Daikin: Beats 35%
  • Summer-long cooling efficiencySEER2BlueRidge: Beats 50%Daikin: Beats 39%
  • Hot-day cooling efficiencyEER2BlueRidge: Beats 49%Daikin: Beats 48%

Average (50%)Dashed outline: the other brand, for comparison

Want ranks, distributions per size class and cold-weather curves? Switch to Advanced

Rebate standards

Share of each brand’s models that meet the level. Programs can have other rules too.
  • CEE 2025

    BlueRidge
    61%
    Daikin
    27%
  • Xcel CC

    BlueRidge
    46%
    Daikin
    15%
  • CEE Advanced

    BlueRidge
    2%
    Daikin
    2%
  • ENERGY STAR CC

    BlueRidge
    47%
    Daikin
    8%

Top cold-climate picks, ductless 3.5–4.5 tons

Only units that keep at least 70% of their heat at 5°F, ranked on heat kept, efficiency at 5°F and seasonal efficiency (HSPF2), against units their size.

BlueRidge

  1. 1BMM48HHCBlueRidge4 tons · 48,000 Btu/h · DuctlessKeeps 92% of its heat at 5°FMeets CEE 2025, CEE 2026, Xcel CC, ENERGY STAR CC
    Heat kept at 5°F
    92% (Capacity at 5°F vs 47°F)
    Great
    Efficiency at 5°F
    2.00 (COP at 5°F)
    Good
    Seasonal efficiency
    10.0 (HSPF2)
    Great
    80.5score / 100
  2. 2BMY60HHUCwith ductless indoor unit BM60MFCCBlueRidge4.5 tons · 55,000 Btu/h · DuctlessKeeps 94% of its heat at 5°FMeets Xcel CC, ENERGY STAR CC
    Heat kept at 5°F
    94% (Capacity at 5°F vs 47°F)
    Top 10%
    Efficiency at 5°F
    1.97 (COP at 5°F)
    Good
    Seasonal efficiency
    10.2 (HSPF2)
    Great
    76.8score / 100
  3. 3BMY48HHUCwith ductless indoor unit BM48MFCCBlueRidge4 tons · 48,000 Btu/h · DuctlessKeeps 96% of its heat at 5°FMeets ENERGY STAR CC
    Heat kept at 5°F
    96% (Capacity at 5°F vs 47°F)
    Top 10%
    Efficiency at 5°F
    1.80 (COP at 5°F)
    Below the middle
    Seasonal efficiency
    9.8 (HSPF2)
    Good
    62.2score / 100

Daikin

  1. 1RZQ42TBVJU*with ductless indoor unit FCQ42AAVJUDaikin3.5 tons · 42,000 Btu/h · DuctlessKeeps 86% of its heat at 5°FMeets CEE 2025, CEE 2026, Xcel CC
    Heat kept at 5°F
    86% (Capacity at 5°F vs 47°F)
    Good
    Efficiency at 5°F
    2.11 (COP at 5°F)
    Top 10%
    Seasonal efficiency
    10.2 (HSPF2)
    Great
    83.0score / 100
  2. 2MST483G22MHAADaikin (sold as Goodman)4 tons · 48,000 Btu/h · DuctlessKeeps 92% of its heat at 5°FMeets CEE 2025, CEE 2026, Xcel CC, ENERGY STAR CC
    Heat kept at 5°F
    92% (Capacity at 5°F vs 47°F)
    Great
    Efficiency at 5°F
    2.00 (COP at 5°F)
    Good
    Seasonal efficiency
    10.0 (HSPF2)
    Great
    80.5score / 100
  3. 3RZQ48TBVJU*with ductless indoor unit FCQ48AAVJUDaikin4 tons · 48,000 Btu/h · DuctlessKeeps 76% of its heat at 5°FMeets none of the standards tracked here
    Heat kept at 5°F
    76% (Capacity at 5°F vs 47°F)
    Good
    Efficiency at 5°F
    2.10 (COP at 5°F)
    Top 10%
    Seasonal efficiency
    10.3 (HSPF2)
    Great
    78.7score / 100

These are certified test ratings, not a recommendation for your home. The right size comes from a load calculation by a contractor.

Next steps

The advanced view adds ranks, both brands’ models inside every size class, standout models per rating and cold-weather curves.

Open the advanced view