Two ways to read the same certified data. Switch any time; your choice is remembered on this device.
GCHV vs Stealth Comfort: heat pump ratings compared
Against heat pumps of the same size and type, a typical GCHV model beats 38% and a typical Stealth Comfort model 76%. Stealth Comfort rates higher overall.
Covers heat pumps sold new today (R-454B and R-32 refrigerant). See older R-410A models · Updated
GCHV
38%
of similar heat pumps beaten by its typical model
Well below average20 models listed
Stealth Comfort
76%
of similar heat pumps beaten by its typical model
Well above average4 models listed
- Efficiency on a 5°F dayCOP at 5°FGCHV: Beats 39%Stealth Comfort: Beats 58%
- Heating power kept at 5°FCapacity at 5°F vs 47°FGCHV: Beats 37%Stealth Comfort: Beats 93%
- Winter-long heating efficiencyHSPF2GCHV: Beats 28%Stealth Comfort: Beats 87%
- Summer-long cooling efficiencySEER2GCHV: Beats 30%Stealth Comfort: Beats 74%
- Hot-day cooling efficiencyEER2GCHV: Beats 51%Stealth Comfort: Beats 72%
Average (50%)Dashed outline: the other brand, for comparison
Want ranks, distributions per size class and cold-weather curves? Switch to Advanced
Rebate standards
CEE 2025
- GCHV
- 20%
- Stealth Comfort
- 100%
Xcel CC
- GCHV
- 20%
- Stealth Comfort
- 100%
CEE Advanced
- GCHV
- 0%
- Stealth Comfort
- 25%
ENERGY STAR CC
- GCHV
- 10%
- Stealth Comfort
- 100%
Top cold-climate picks, ductless 2.5–3 tons
Only units that keep at least 70% of their heat at 5°F, ranked on heat kept, efficiency at 5°F and seasonal efficiency (HSPF2), against units their size.
Showing Ductless, 2.5–3 tons (27,000–38,999 Btu/h cooling). What size is my system?
GCHV
No ductless, 2.5–3 tons model from GCHV.
Stealth Comfort
No ductless, 2.5–3 tons model from Stealth Comfort.
These are certified test ratings, not a recommendation for your home. The right size comes from a load calculation by a contractor.
Next steps
The advanced view adds ranks, both brands’ models inside every size class, standout models per rating and cold-weather curves.
Open the advanced view