Two ways to read the same certified data. Switch any time; your choice is remembered on this device.
CIAC heat pump efficiency: 3 outdoor models compared
CIAC has 3 heat pump outdoor models certified with this refrigerant group, in 4 AHRI-certified combinations. Each model is compared with models of the same size and duct type, so the scores below do not depend on which sizes CIAC makes. CIAC has no QMID (IRS Qualified Manufacturer ID) on file, so it is not ranked against other manufacturers.
New to heat pump ratings? The Simple view explains them in plain words →
ManufacturerData as of updated · sources
- Outdoor models
- 3
- AHRI certifications
- 4
- Efficiency index
- 38%
- Typical model vs same-size, same-type peers (1 model)
- Meet CEE 2025
- 33.3%
- 1 model
How CIAC compares with comparable models
- CIAC
- Middle half of its models
- Other ranked manufacturers
Source: AHRI Directory, NEEP · as of
| Rating | Beats comparable models | Rank | Raw median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Efficiency index1 model scored | 38% | Not ranked | — |
| COP at 5°F2 models scored | 83% | Not ranked | 2.13 |
| Capacity retention at 5°F1 model scored | 16% | Not ranked | 67% |
| HSPF23 models scored | 11% | Not ranked | 8.0 |
| SEER23 models scored | 22% | Not ranked | 17.0 |
| EER23 models scored | 14% | Not ranked | 9.5 |
| Heating capacity at 5°F2 models scored | 17% | Not ranked | 6,700 Btu/h |
Standards met
| Standard | Share | Models |
|---|---|---|
| CEE 2025 Tier 1 (Split ASHP) | 33.3% | 1 |
| CEE 2026 Tier 1 (Split ASHP) | 33.3% | 1 |
| CEE Advanced Tier (Split ASHP) | 0% | 0 |
| Xcel Energy Colorado cold-climate ASHP (2025) | 0% | 0 |
| DOE Cold Climate Heat Pump Challenge | 0% | 0 |
| ENERGY STAR Cold Climate | 0% | 0 |
Sizes and duct types offered
- CIAC (median, middle 50%, 10th–90th)
- All models of the group
Source: AHRI Directory · as of
| Size and duct type | Models | Index | COP@5°F | HSPF2 | SEER2 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-ducted, up to 1.5 tons | 1 | 38% | 70% | 29% | 58% |
| Non-ducted, 2.5–3 tons | 2 | — | 96% | 2% | 3% |
Every CIAC model in the market
- CIAC models
- Ducted median by size
- Non-ducted median by size
- Every model at each size (width = count)
- Standard threshold
Show the data as a table
| Duct type, size | Models | 10th pct. | 25th | Median | 75th | 90th |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ducted, 0.5 tons | 826 | 1.64 | 1.71 | 1.75 | 1.85 | 2.24 |
| Ducted, 1 ton | 407 | 1.80 | 1.90 | 2.05 | 2.41 | 2.45 |
| Ducted, 1.5 tons | 992 | 1.75 | 1.86 | 2.00 | 2.17 | 2.40 |
| Ducted, 2 tons | 999 | 1.75 | 1.86 | 2.00 | 2.18 | 2.30 |
| Ducted, 2.5 tons | 1,040 | 1.70 | 1.80 | 2.00 | 2.10 | 2.36 |
| Ducted, 3 tons | 696 | 1.80 | 1.90 | 2.00 | 2.10 | 2.42 |
| Ducted, 3.5 tons | 864 | 1.70 | 1.80 | 2.00 | 2.10 | 2.46 |
| Ducted, 4 tons | 727 | 1.80 | 1.86 | 2.00 | 2.12 | 2.40 |
| Ducted, 4.5 tons | 690 | 1.70 | 1.80 | 1.90 | 2.10 | 2.20 |
| Ducted, 5 tons | 86 | 1.89 | 2.00 | 2.10 | 2.10 | 2.10 |
| Non-ducted, 0.5 tons | 1,186 | 1.75 | 1.80 | 1.90 | 2.00 | 2.22 |
| Non-ducted, 1 ton | 1,343 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 1.99 | 2.10 | 2.21 |
| Non-ducted, 1.5 tons | 1,261 | 1.80 | 1.80 | 2.00 | 2.10 | 2.31 |
| Non-ducted, 2 tons | 761 | 1.80 | 1.98 | 2.00 | 2.10 | 2.30 |
| Non-ducted, 2.5 tons | 403 | 1.80 | 1.85 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.10 |
| Non-ducted, 3 tons | 473 | 1.90 | 1.98 | 2.00 | 2.03 | 2.20 |
| Non-ducted, 3.5 tons | 280 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.00 | 2.05 | 2.10 |
| Non-ducted, 4 tons | 204 | 1.96 | 2.00 | 2.05 | 2.10 | 2.11 |
| Non-ducted, 4.5 tons | 78 | 1.90 | 1.91 | 1.95 | 2.01 | 2.01 |
| Non-ducted, 5 tons | 84 | 1.99 | 2.00 | 2.05 | 2.20 | 2.20 |
Source: AHRI Directory · as of
Top CIAC models
Cold-climate picks
No CIAC model keeps at least 70% of its heat at 5°F with all three cold-climate ratings.
All-around best
| # · Outdoor model | Size · type | Cap. 5/47 | COP@5°F | HSPF2 | SEER2 | EER2 | Meets | Combos | AHRI ref. | Compared with | Score | Heating half | Cooling half | Cold-climate score |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1CPEA12AC1151AOCIACwith ductless indoor unit CPEA12AC1151AH | 1 ton12,000 Btu/h · Non-ducted | 67% | 2.05 | 9.0 | 22.0 | 10.0 | CEE 25CEE 26 | 1 | 218814656 | Non-ducted, up to 1.5 tons | 37.8 | 38.6 | 37.0 | Not a pick |
Best model on each rating
| Rating | Model | Value | Compared with | Beats | AHRI ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| COP at 5°F | PCG817A-X036PHB3C | 2.21 | Non-ducted, 2.5–3 tons | 96% | 213927897 |
| Capacity retention at 5°F | CPEA12AC1151AO | 67% | Non-ducted, up to 1.5 tons | 16% | 218814656 |
| HSPF2 | CPEA12AC1151AO | 9.0 | Non-ducted, up to 1.5 tons | 29% | 218814656 |
| SEER2 | CPEA12AC1151AO | 22.0 | Non-ducted, up to 1.5 tons | 56% | 218814656 |
| EER2 | CPEA12AC1151AO | 10.0 | Non-ducted, up to 1.5 tons | 16% | 218814656 |
| Heating capacity at 5°F | CPEA12AC1151AO | 8,200 Btu/h | Non-ducted, up to 1.5 tons | 32% | 218814656 |
CIAC size class by size class: cold-climate and all-around
| Size and duct type | Cold-climate pickCold-climate score, best model | All-around bestAll-around score, best model |
|---|---|---|
| Non-ducted, up to 1.5 tons | None on this board (0 of 1 models qualify) | 37.8(50 is the typical model of its size class)CPEA12AC1151AOwith ductless indoor unit CPEA12AC1151AH1 of 1 models have all five ratings · AHRI 218814656 |
| Non-ducted, 2.5–3 tons | None on this board (0 of 2 models qualify) | None on this board (0 of 2 models have all five ratings) |
Newest CIAC certifications
| Outdoor model | Size · type | COP@5°F | Cap. 5/47 | HSPF2 | SEER2 | Meets | Combos | AHRI ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CPEA36AC2301AOCIACwith ductless indoor unit CPEA36AC2301AH | 3 tons34,000 Btu/h · Non-ducted | — | — | 8.0 | 17.0 | None | 1 | 218814657 |
| CPEA12AC1151AOCIACwith ductless indoor unit CPEA12AC1151AH | 1 ton12,000 Btu/h · Non-ducted | 2.05 | 67% | 9.0 | 22.0 | CEE 25CEE 26 | 1 | 218814656 |
| PCG817A-X036PHB3CCIACwith ductless indoor unit PCH817A-X036-HB3C | 3 tons34,000 Btu/h · Non-ducted | 2.21 | — | 8.0 | 17.0 | None | 2 | 216774443 |
Compare CIAC
CIAC includes these brand names as listed in AHRI: CIAC. Standards are checked against published thresholds; program rules beyond ratings are not checked.